Trading Logical Case For 49% Drop In Stocks

Discussion in 'Share Investing Strategies, Theories & Education' started by Tropo, 6th Sep, 2011.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Tropo

    Tropo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    2,303
    Location:
    NSW
  2. wdongli

    wdongli Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    1,128
    Location:
    Perth
    In the eye of a tsunami, is it possible to predict future damage? The safest way is to predict you are in the eye. Is it Australia in the eye? Would gold be melted into the ashes in the storm?

    What if all drop down 49%?
    What if not all drop down 49%?
    What if you are absolutely right?
    What if you are absolutely wrong?
    What is the relationship between risks and rewards?

    Is it worse than GFC time?
    Have you bought some insurance?
    What fears could do for you?
    What fears could do for the market as a whole?

    Patters are lovely but what if we refer to some wrong patterns?
    Is the judgment day moving in?

    Why don't you run?
    Where could you run?
    Stock market is the barometer of economies. What if everything crashes down?
    In March 2009, too many predicted the end days of the modern financial system, right?

    Yes, now it is the time to destroy all! Run and run even nowhere you could run! Could you dare to sell and buy into gold? If not where you should put your money in and keep your job safe if everything just crash down?

    God, only you could help us and let us know where we could run! We are all too fearful even somebodies all tell us we should be greedy when the market as whole is fearful!

    If you don't have a place to run, please choose CTO, IAU, RSN, MPJ, or RAU...where I have got some positions for insurance!
     
  3. Chris C

    Chris C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    904
    Location:
    Brisbane, QLD
    I don't know if I'd call their case "logical"... but it's definitely "possible" for other "more logical" reasons.

    That said, the FED no doubt already has their finger firmly positioned over the "print" button these days in the event of rapid asset price falls which it didn't back in 2000 and 2008 - and having used it twice already a third or fourth time won't be an issue.
     
  4. Tropo

    Tropo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    2,303
    Location:
    NSW
    What is logical for author of this presentation, may not be logical for others.
    But after all he made a good point at a time of his presentation.