Home | Log in | Join Now! | Blog | Contact    Subscribe to the InvestEd Forum feed (new threads) via RSS
InvestEd :: Wealth Education for Australian Investors

Notices

Offset account vs Redraw for future deductions

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 30-04-2008, 01:10 PM   #1
ach
Member
 
Posts: 3
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Offset account vs Redraw for future deductions

Hi all,

I have a question I would like to hear your opinions on. My situation is this - I plan to buy a property, and will be occupying this initially. I do plan to rent this out in 1-2 years' time.

My question has to do with the tax deductability of the home loan structure. Ideally I would have an 100% offset account, into which I can deposit all my surplus funds in order to minimise the interest while I am occupying it, and when it becomes an investment property, I can then withdraw those funds for whatever purpose I see fit. The full amount of the interest payable on the loan at that point, will be tax deductible.

However, will the same result be possible using a redraw facility? Say I make $50k additional repayments into the loan while I am occupying it, which will reduce the interest payable. Then, prior to renting it out, I redraw that $50k to bring the loan balance up again. At the point I rent it out, will the full amount of the interest payable be tax deductible? Or will that $50k be deemed ineligible as a investment cost, thus forcing me to apportion the interest payable?
To me, it seems to basically boil down to whether the transactions prior to the property becoming an investment, are relevant.

Any opinions on this?

Thanks for any input.
ach is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 30-04-2008, 01:21 PM   #2
Member
 
tailcat's Avatar
 
Posts: 96
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Yeppoon
Ach,

Your basic understanding is correct.

Go for the offset account and you can do what you want with the 50k.

If you put the 50k in a redraw and then redraw it for non-investment purposes (a car) then you lose the tax deductibility of the 50k.

Always keep your investment borrowings completely separate from anything else.

Tailcat
tailcat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 30-04-2008, 03:56 PM   #3
ach
Member
 
Posts: 3
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Thanks for the reply tailcat.

Just to confirm what you’re saying – do you think I will lose the tax deductability of the $50k, even if the redraw is done well before I turn it into an investment property?

A bank employee told me that what I do before the property becomes an investment, is irrelevant. According to her, the ATO only cares from the point at which it becomes an income-producing asset. Does that make sense, or is she ill-informed?
ach is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 30-04-2008, 05:10 PM   #4
Member
 
Posts: 717
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Yes what you do prior to it becoming an IP does matter.

The deductible portion of your loan will be that part that represents the cost of acquisition (or improvements) OF YOUR IP.

Any redrawing for private purposes prior to vacating and renting will not be interest deductible.

TR 2000/2

The bank employee may have been quoted out of context as your advice sounds incorrect - I hope you neither paid for nor acted on this advice.

Always get specific advice to your personal circumstances from an qualified Advisor BEFORE you act. This forum is necessarily general in nature due to brief facts and uncertain context.

Cheers,

Rob
Rob G. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 30-04-2008, 10:31 PM   #5
Member
 
Posts: 27
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by ach View Post
A bank employee told me that what I do before the property becomes an investment, is irrelevant. According to her, the ATO only cares from the point at which it becomes an income-producing asset. Does that make sense, or is she ill-informed?
This is a very good example of why you should not take tax advice from someone not qualified to give it. Utterly hopeless. I wonder how many people have taken her advice though?
GavinC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 08:43 PM   #6
ach
Member
 
Posts: 3
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Thanks for the info guys.

Yes, I do think the bank employee didn't know what she was talking about. Thing is, I even had a conversation with her manager, who was of the same opinion.

I want to get a professional opinion from a qualified accountant/tax advisor, but I don't really know where to look. I rang up an accountant who claimed to be a tax specialist, just out of the Yellow Pages, and he quoted me $330 an hour! Not only that, he specified upfront payment before any sort of consultation.

I balked at the $330 fee - I mean, it would take at least half an hour to properly go through my specific situation, so even before I have any clue as to this guy's competence, I am up for at least $175? Sounds pretty steep to me.

Is this the general ballpark figure for tax advice though? I have never consulted an accountant or tax advisor, so have no idea what to expect.

Also, I would love to hear if any of you can recommend a good tax advisor. I work in Sydney CBD, so that would be ideal.

Thanks in advance for any information.

Andrew

Last edited by ach; 06-05-2008 at 08:45 PM. Reason: Grammatical error
ach is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 09:28 PM   #7
Member
 
Posts: 717
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Can't help with recommendations, except to say that any decent Tax Agent should be able to cope with the problem based on your previous facts.

Whilst acting based on the rulings might absolve you from penalties if you "reasonably believe" they apply to you, it is important to note that if you act without fully understanding ESPECIALLY if you did not seek advice then this may not help you.

Take a read of these on the ATO website (search Legal Database)

TR 2004/4 Interest before income commences

TR 2000/2 Redraw & LOC

TR 93/6 Offset accounts

I always shudder when I refer anybody to them, as many people seem to read into these opinions much more than I do. I guess a layman is more ready to make inferences and jump to conclusions - BEWARE !!!!

That is what you pay for - the interpretation of where the boundary lies in your particular facts.

Cheers,

Rob
Rob G. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 10:33 PM   #8
Member
 
Posts: 49
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Perth, W.A.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob G. View Post
TR 93/6 Offset accounts
I found this ruling an amusing read. The way that the examples in the ruling are described is quite droll, indicating that at least one person in the ATO still had a functioning sense of humour.
Thudd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2011, 03:19 PM   #9
Member
 
Posts: 32
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Milan, MI
Aren't redraw and offset really the same?

Hi all, thought I'd bump this old thread. I had a loan pre-approved (whilst I was still working) with State Custodians for an investment property. They told me the loan had an offset (all-in-one) account. Now that I'm about to make an offer on a property, they are telling me that it is in fact a redraw account, but works exactly the same as an offset account in that I have full access to any extra repayments.
My plan was to put about $300,000 straight into the offset, and then redraw it in a few months time as a deposit on a principal place of residence. Does this mean the interest would lose it's deductibility?

Thanks
karen
K_veg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2011, 04:37 PM   #10
Member
 
Terryw's Avatar
 
Posts: 538
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney
Quote:
Originally Posted by K_veg View Post
Hi all, thought I'd bump this old thread. I had a loan pre-approved (whilst I was still working) with State Custodians for an investment property. They told me the loan had an offset (all-in-one) account. Now that I'm about to make an offer on a property, they are telling me that it is in fact a redraw account, but works exactly the same as an offset account in that I have full access to any extra repayments.
My plan was to put about $300,000 straight into the offset, and then redraw it in a few months time as a deposit on a principal place of residence. Does this mean the interest would lose it's deductibility?

Thanks
karen
Hi Karen

Yes you would lose deductibility.

Many a lender says that the offet is the same as the redraw. It may work out the same in terms of interest charged, but not in terms of tax. And $300,000 would work out to be a lot of tax savings.
__________________
Regards

Terryw
http://www.terryw.com.au/
Terryw is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
loan offset account saves $47952, are my calculations wrong? benneh Real Estate 5 17-08-2007 02:17 AM
Offset account questions caz Finance and Banking 1 12-07-2007 10:10 PM
Offset Account Spreadsheet HHH Investing Spreadsheet Repository 5 26-07-2006 07:04 PM
Accessing funds in a LOC and an offset account??? jscott Investing Strategies 2 21-03-2006 10:39 AM


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:35 AM.

Copyright © 2006 Investor Education Pty Ltd (ACN 114 677 226)
Site by Hampel Group